If Lousia May Alcott Lived in Modern Times ...

My recent post on Stephen King and the lack of success he would have if he was an unknown writer attempting to publish his first novel, Carrie, in the current era make me think of another author and the lack of success they would have writing for the modern market. Lousia May Alcott is another brilliant writer who probably wouldn't be able to find either publication, or an audience of willing readers, if she were alive today and trying to get published.

Granted, Alcott's most famous novel Little Women was written purely for commercial purposes. Prior to that, Alcott had attempted to write and publish several novels that were of little interest to anyone, due to their lack of marketable content in the time and era where she lived. And then there is that whole urban myth about how she hated little girls. Anyway, Little Women, proved so popular with it's themes of loyalty and living right that it soon spawned a sequel titled Good Wives where the March sisters grew up. Or three of them did, with Beth famously passing away. The oldest March sister, Meg, was married off at the beginning of the novel, starts popping out babies and subsequently does little in the remainder of the novel, suggesting that, despite the title, Alcott does not find married life to be terribly interesting or worthy literary material. Meanwhile, Amy travels overseas where she is reunited with Jo's childhood friend Laurie. They fall in love and marry, much to the vexation of Jo who had turned down Laurie's marriage proposal some time before. And, because Jo is the real star of the series, you'd think that Alcott would have a pretty kick arse romance for her in the works. After all, the book is titled Good Wives. All of the March sisters are meant to find their handsome prince. So who will he be? Will he be rich? Clever? Handsome?

Actually, Jo's husband-to-be is a bumbling professor in his forties named Fritz. Yes. Fritz. This guy:


William Shatner as Fritz Bhear in a somewhat forgettable
TV version of Little Women. 

Jo March has a love interest who isn't hot. And he isn't a millionaire. It's the most unlikely romance in literature since Marianne from Sense and Sensibility got hitched to that old army guy. (Who was superbly played by Alan Rickman in the film version, but that is another story.) And, I repeat. He isn't hot. He's not hot folks.

And this leaves me wondering and pondering what would have happened if Louisa May Alcott was trying to publish Good Wives in the present day. What would readers in the post-Twilight/Fifty Shades of Grey era make of a love interest who isn't well ... hot. Or rich. Or even you know, hot underneath all of the dorky professor outfits. I can almost see the tirade of complaints on goodreads. I read through all of these pages just waiting to see who Jo would end up with ... and she goes and marries some crusty old professor. I'm giving this book half a star on that alone. And that's just assuming that the book even makes it to publication. I can just see someone trying to encourage the author to drop Fritz's age by about fifteen years, jack up his income and add in some totally unnecessary paragraphs about his six pack. Totally unnecessary and counterproductive to any point that the author may have been trying to make about Jo holding out for a man who values her independence and intelligence, but hey, you know, at least he's hot. 

**Note. In Australia and many other parts of the world Little Women and Good Wives are published as two separate volumes. In the US and Canada, the books are always contained in the same volume and are published as Little Women. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Peppermint Patty: I Cried and Cried and Cried

Image
Unrequited love is a common theme in the Peanuts Comics and is one that I have previously explored on this blog. We know that Lucy loves Schroeder, Sally loves Linus and Charlie Brown has a crush on the unseen, unnamed and utterly unattainable Little Redhaired Girl. But perhaps the saddest unrequited love stories from the comic is that which ran in late June 1972. It was the series of strips where the usually self-confident Peppermint Patty came face-to-face with the Little Redhaired Girl with the intention of thumping her and then something surprising happened: Here we have a usually self-confident girl, who is funny, unashamedly herself and talented at sports reduced to tears by the realisation of who she is not and never can be. I really feel for her in this series of comic strips. She knows that Charlie Brown can never love her, when he is so hung up over a girl who represents a supposedly ideal feminine beauty. Fortunately Linus, the most spiritual member of the Pean...
Read more

Charlie Brown, Lucy Van Pelt and the Football

Image
One of the longest, and arguably, most infuriating, running gags in Charles Schulz's otherwise brilliant Peanuts comic strip, is where Lucy promises to hold a football for Charlie Brown and then pulls it away at the last minute, causing Charlie Brown to fall flat on his back. A typical strip looks like this: Source: Go Comics The gag is one of the darker themes in the strip. It works on the concept that every year, Lucy promises to hold a football for Charlie Brown. Every year, Charlie Brown is initially filled with doubt but is eventually pushed on by a kind of optimism that perhaps, this time, Lucy might just let him kick it after all. As a metaphor for life, it is pretty simple. It talks of the moments when we choose to put our trust in people who have let us down only to be taken by surprise when they let us down, again. Lucy is, arguably, one of the crueller characters in the comic. Described as crabby by the other characters, she is often selfish, takes delight in wilfully hu...
Read more

Phrases and Idioms: Tickets on Himself

To have tickets on himself: (Australian slang.) To be conceited or vain. To have an overinflated opinion of oneself.  He's got tickets on himself if he thinks that any woman would fall for that. I was thinking about this particular bit of Australian slang the other day, after my boss said, "He's got tickets on himself," to describe the actions of a particular individual. At the time, I smiled, knowing exactly what the boss meant. Later on, I started to ponder on this unusual phrase and wondered where it might have come from. A search on google helped me find the definition, but that was about all. There are no references to it being used in pop culture or literature (if you find one, let me know,) and at the time of writing this post, Tickets on Himself was not listed on Urban Dictionary. (I tried to add it, but the fuckers rejected my definition. They probably think I have tickets on myself or something for trying to add a relatively common piece of A...
Read more